Economic Prosperity is Essential to Fighting the War on Terrorism

December 15, 2007

Our military power is critical in defending our Nation and defeating the terrorists. It takes money to run the military. That money is generated by a strong economy. Taxes, overspending, inefficient and duplicative government operations, and unnecessary regulations depress the economy. Thus, without lower taxes, a cut in spending, and a reformation of failing government programs, we limit the money we have to fund our military. Without a strong military we cannot defeat our enemies.

It is therefore essential that we elect someone who will implement those measures aimed to stimulate the economy. Huckabee’s record as governor of Arkansas indicates that he will raise taxes, overspend, and over regulate our economy if he becomes the President.

Mitt Romney, on the other hand, made a living in the private sector and as governor of Massachusetts at reviving failing organizations and reducing inefficient operations. As Governor he faced a $3 billion deficit when he took office in 2003. He was determined to stop the madness. He lowered taxes, cut spending and reorganized the state. By 2006, the state no longer had a deficit, in fact, it had a $700 million surplus.

Mitt Romney believes the strength of America comes from the people. Mitt’s economic policy will not only allow each American to keep more of their hard earned money, but, most importantly, it will enable us to maintain the strongest military in the world.

Click here to view a related entry.

The Iowa Caucus is approaching fast and Mitt needs your help. Please visit www.mittromney.com and contribute to his campaign.


Guiliani’s Homeland Security Team Consists of Almost ALL NEW YORKERS!!!

September 9, 2007

Beware American’s. If elected, Guiliani will continue to support “sanctuary cities.” Just look at the list of people who are his Homeland Security Advisers — they are almost ALL loyal NEW YORKERS.

According to yahoo news, “The only other city represented is Indianapolis … [and t]he only person with state experience is from Minnesota …. No one is included from the South or Southwest with experience with hurricanes …. There is no one represented from California, which has a lot of infrastructure of importance to the U.S. economy.”

Here’s the complete list:

    • Chairman Louis Freeh, former director of the FBI;
    • Chief Homeland Security Adviser Rob Bonner, former Customs and Border Protection commissioner;
    • Rep. Peter T. King, R-N.Y.;
    • Joe Whitley, former DHS general counsel;
    • Joshua Filler, former director of DHS’ office of state and local government coordination;
    • Andrew Maner, former DHS chief financial officer;
    • Jon Odermatt, former commissioner of FEMA’s New York City office;
    • Howard Safir, former New York City police commissioner;
    • Richard Sheirer, former commissioner of FEMA’s New York City office;
    • Stewart Verdery, former DHS assistant secretary for policy and planning;
    • Thomas Von Essen, former New York City Fire commissioner;
    • Seth Stodder, former Customs and Border Protection director of policy and planning;
    • Peter Beering, former coordinator for Indiana Terrorism Preparedness;
    • Daniel Johnson, former director of Homeland Security for Minnesota;
    • John Rabin, former program director for DHS’ Security’s Lessons Learned Information Sharing program.

To contribute to Mitt’s campaign or to learn more about his stance on important issues, please visit www.mittromney.com.


Now is NOT the Time to Give Up!!! We Need a Surge of Support for our Troops!!!

September 5, 2007

Here is an article from the Wall Street Journal written by Kimberly Kagan on September 4, 2007. The title is “The Tide Is Turning in Iraq.” Here’s the article:

    The initial concept of the “surge” strategy in Iraq was to secure Baghdad and its immediate environs, which is why its proper name was the “Baghdad Security Plan.” But as President Bush pointed out during his surprise trip to Iraq, operations and events on the ground are already showing successes well beyond Baghdad in Anbar, Diyala and Salahaddin provinces — formerly al Qaeda strongholds and hotbeds of the Sunni insurgency.

    Considering the speed with which these successes have developed, and the rapidly growing grass-roots movement among Iraqis to support the effort, there is every reason to be optimistic about the prospects for establishing security in Iraq, and every reason to continue supporting the current strategy.

    The first major combat operation of the surge, Operation Phantom Thunder, began on June 15 and accomplished its primary objectives. American troops and Iraqi Security Forces eliminated all of al Qaeda’s sanctuaries in the Baghdad belts, including its urban stronghold in Baqubah. U.S. forces cleared Dora, al Qaeda’s stronghold in western Baghdad. They established an extensive net of outposts in former enemy safe havens, degraded the capabilities of Shiite militias, and dramatically reduced sectarian violence and spectacular attacks in and around the capital.

    Phantom Thunder was the first coherent campaign aimed at all of the major al Qaeda strongholds at once. As a result, terrorists could not move from one safe haven to another. Iraqi and Coalition forces killed, wounded and captured thousands of them.

    Six months ago, insurgents operated freely around Baghdad’s belts. Now U.S. and Iraqi forces limit them to discrete areas, more distant from urban centers, where they cannot easily defend themselves, or support one another or their vehicle-bomb network. Smaller groups who escaped from their safe havens during combat operations generally fled along the Tigris and Diyala River valleys. The remnants of al Qaeda in western Baghdad can no longer quickly reinforce their positions from outside or within the city.

    Gens. David Petraeus and Raymond Odierno followed up Phantom Thunder with Phantom Strike. The new campaign, launched on Aug. 13, aims to prevent terrorists and militias from reconstituting their forces in Baghdad, its belts or elsewhere. U.S. and Iraqi forces are moving along the river valleys to destroy the remnants of enemy groups and eliminate any new safe havens they try to establish. Their operations are also preventing Shiite militias from taking over territory al Qaeda once controlled.

    Phantom Strike involves Coalition and Iraqi forces throughout central Iraq. U.S. forces are clearing a wedge of terrain between the Tigris and Diyala Rivers north of Baghdad and holding those river lines. Operation Lightning Hammer, part of Phantom Strike, cleared 50 villages in the palm groves of the Diyala River valley, permitting U.S. and Iraqi forces to establish a combat outpost 15 miles northeast of Baqubah to secure the area. U.S. and Iraqi forces have captured Iranian-supported extremist leaders on the Tigris River’s east bank, and they are striking al Qaeda in Balad, Samarra and Tikrit.

    Meanwhile, Phantom Strike has dismantled a vehicle-bomb network in central Baghdad. And to the south of the city U.S. forces are destroying remnants of al Qaeda in Arab Jabour and Salman Pak — both al Qaeda safe havens just months ago.

    Skillful combat — and skillful negotiation — have transformed the area formerly known as “the triangle of death” into a region of dawning, if precarious, stability. As Coalition forces consolidate their gains in these areas, they are also striking Shiite militia sanctuaries east of Baghdad and further south and east along the Tigris River valley. Gen. Odierno and his division commanders cleared territory gradually throughout Phantom Thunder and Phantom Strike, so that they could hold it after clearing operations.

    The tribal movement begun in Anbar has spread throughout central Iraq, as thousands of Sunnis have either volunteered to join the Iraqi Security Forces or formed local defense groups under Iraqi government and Coalition auspices. These “concerned citizens” groups springing up throughout central Iraq have not been previously observed on this scale in the country. They permit U.S. and Iraqi forces to hold territory they have cleared more effectively. The volunteers who make up these groups, recruited and deployed in their own neighborhoods, have incentives to protect their families and communities. They are not independent militias, however. They are partnered with Iraqi Security Forces and Coalition forces.

    The Baqubah Guardians, one such group, recently helped the Iraqi police in that city fight off al Qaeda insurgents until Coalition helicopters arrived. The Taji Neighborhood Watch association searched hundreds of homes for weapons caches. Iraq has hitherto lacked a local policing initiative, relying instead on national and regional models. The concerned-citizen groups are filling this gap while the U.S. and the Iraqi governments work to expand and improve the Iraqi Security Forces that many of these volunteers hope to join.

    There is every prospect of extending this movement further. Residents of freshly cleared Arab Jabour have volunteered to join the Iraqi Security Forces, indicating that the population there feels increasingly secure from terrorists. Tribal leaders in the Diyala River valley, many of whom have fought with one another since 2006, met immediately after Operation Lightning Hammer ended and swore to fight terrorism and work together as a single tribe.

    Tribal leaders encourage local citizens to join the Iraqi Security Forces, working as volunteers before they are accepted into the police or army to identify weapons caches and terrorists to Iraqi or Coalition forces. U.S. commanders hold tribal leaders accountable when they fail to secure their area properly. U.S. forces take fingerprints and retina scans and record the serial numbers of the weapons of citizen-group members. This helps them vet the groups for dangerous insurgents and hold accountable anyone who turns against the Coalition.

    The Iraqi government determines whether or not the volunteers are accepted into the security forces. In mid-August, the government enrolled 1,700 new Iraqi policemen from the mostly Sunni former insurgent enclave of Abu Ghraib.

    The destruction of al Qaeda sanctuaries has permitted Coalition forces to focus more on the violent Shiite militia groups funded by Iran. These groups are responsible for kidnapping numerous Iraqi government officials, running sectarian death squads and conducting mortar and rocket attacks against the Green Zone.

    The Iranian Revolutionary Guard’s elite Quds Force and Hezbollah have organized, trained and funded this network of Iraqi special groups, which could not sustain themselves without foreign support. Offensive operations targeting these groups have intensified, a development also made possible by the increasing cooperation of the Maliki government. Coalition and Iraqi forces have been redeployed to disrupt the groups’ communication and supply routes east and south of Baghdad. A multi-phase campaign to capture or kill secret cell leaders is also underway across central and southern Iraq and in Baghdad.

    In short, American forces are in the midst of a large, complex campaign to defeat al Qaeda, dismantle Iranian-backed Shiite criminal militias, support a growing grass-roots movement in the Sunni population, and create space for political progress at the national level. Al Qaeda is not defunct by any means. It continues to fight and is trying to re-establish itself. It will certainly try to conduct a large-scale terror campaign to coincide with Gen. Petraeus’s report to Americans later this month on the progress of the surge.

    The Shiite militias seem more daunted. Moqtada al Sadr has ordered his Mahdi Army fighters to cease operations against U.S. and Iraqi forces — from his refuge in Iran.

    Significant challenges remain in establishing security, building up Iraqi forces capable of maintaining it and helping the Iraqi government achieve reconciliation and unity. But few expected the progress made so far. The tide in Iraq is clearly turning, as the Iraqi people are voting with their lives to fight with us against terrorists and militias. Now is not the time to give up the fight.

    Ms. Kagan is an affiliate of Harvard’s John M. Olin Institute of Strategic Studies and the president of the Institute for the Study of War in Washington.

Mitt believes Americans needs to show the troops a surge of support. Click here to watch a YOUTUBE VIDEO in which Mitt articulates his belief.

To contribute to Mitt’s campaign or to learn more about his stance on important issues, please visit www.mittromney.com.


“It’s a time for action … I believe in the people of America.”

February 24, 2007

“It’s a time for action … I believe in the people of America … A free American people are the source of this country’s great strength.” Those are a few quotes from Mitt’s first TV advertisement which people in Florida, Iowa, South Carolina, Michigan, and New Hampshire heard. Check it out:

To contribute to Mitt’s campaign or to learn more about his stance on important issues, please visit www.mittromney.com.


Mitt Romney’s Speech at the Herzliya Conference: The Plan to Confront Iran

January 23, 2007

Click the link below to watch Mitt Romney’s speech at the Herzliya Conference in Israel. In the speech he declares how the civilized world should stop Iran.

Part 1: http://mittromney.permissiontv.com/?showid=38211
Part 2: http://mittromney.permissiontv.com/?showid=38225

Here are excerpts of his speech taken from www.herzliyaconference.org:

“I am glad to be in Israel again, in a country I love with people I love. It’s been ten years since I was last here. The country has changed. It is a lot greener with a lot more trees, and also has more highways. However, I was struck by how vibrant the economy is. As someone who worked in the private sector, I am impressed with Israel’s resilience.”

“The world has also changed. Unfortunately, many have not caught up with the strategic paradigm. Many years ago, the Arab-Israeli conflict was looked at as a regional conflict that dragged on, but it was not looked at as part of a global threat. September 11th should have changed that. Resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict will not mollify the Jihadists. It has been the oldest most radical front of the Islamic jihad in the world. This has not been about borders. This is about the failure for them to acknowledge Israel’s right to exist. … “

“The focus in the United States is on Iraq now-a-days. This has been a painful time for the U.S. as of late with as many deaths of our soldiers as we have had. With as many mistakes as the U.S. has made, we are committed to making every effort for success in Iraq. There are some Congressional leaders arguing that the President is not allowed to authorize more forces in Iraq – this is not true.”

“The heart of the Jihadist threat is Iran. Iran’s leaders and ambitions represent the greatest threat the world has seen since Communism and Nazism before that. Ahmedinijad is a horrible leader as he denies the Holocaust, but his main purpose of denying the Holocaust is to deny the state of Israel. He is testing the waters to see who responds. This threat would take on a new dimension if they were allowed nuclear power. This could be the tipping point of development and proliferation of nuclear weapons.”

“We need to dispense with three wishful lines of thinking. 1) We hope that Iran’s weakening economy will end the leadership. 2) It is possible to live with a nuclear Iran – thinking that Iran, once being allowed to join the nuclear club, will act responsibly. 3) There is deterrence, like their was in Soviet Russia, but the Russians were never suicidal. This cannot be said for a regime that celebrates martyrdom. …”

“Attempting to defeat totalitarianism in the last century did not always show that the west would win. We were afraid of major losses. We did not lose though. In the current conflict, we can lose only by not lifting a finger to help ourselves. It is time for the world to speak three truths: 1) Iran must be stopped; 2) Iran can be stopped; 3) Iran will be stopped!”

To read Mitt’s entire speech click here. You can also read Newt Gingrich and John Edwards’ speeches by clicking here for Gingrich’s and here for Edwards’.

To contribute to Mitt’s campaign or to find more news on current events and information on Mitt Romney’s stance on important issues, please visit his official website at www.mittromney.com.


Mitt’s Reaction to Bush’s New Iraq Strategy

January 15, 2007

Overall, Mitt supports President Bush’s new strategy in Iraq. Click here www.mittromney.com to see Mitt’s official press release.

To contribute to Mitt’s campaign or to find more news on current events and information on Mitt Romney’s stance on important issues, please visit his official website at www.mittromney.com.


The Strength of the American People

January 8, 2007

In an address to Awakening 2007, Mitt Romney stated, “At this decisive moment in our nation’s journey into a new global frontier, there are two competing visions about how America must meet a new generation of challenges. We must choose between calling on stronger government – the liberal vision – or calling on the strength of the American people – and that is my vision.”

I agree, the strength of America is in its people. History has revealed that great civilizations have self destructed when its people lose the love of freedom and fail to defend it. “The first free people, the Greeks, died . . . [because a] slackness and softness finally came over them to their ruin. In the end more than they wanted freedom they wanted security, a comfortable life, and they lost all—security, comfort and freedom.” Ezra Taft Benson, An Enemy Hath Done This (Parliament Publisher 1969 p 50-51) (quoting the Indianapolis Star which was commenting on a statement made by the communist leader Lenin).

In the end, if we American’s continue to look to the comfort and security of big government instead of our own ambitions, ingenuity, and labors, we, like the Greeks and other great civilizations, will lose all. Let us stand for freedom and against big government. Let us stand for Mitt Romney.

For more news on current events and information on Mitt Romney’s stance on important issues, please visit his official website at www.mittromney.com.


Government Reform Ensures Nation’s Security

December 20, 2006

Mitt Romney’s most outstanding quality is his unbelievable success at turning around failing organizations and governments. However, Mitt’s perceived weakness is his lack of military experience. On the other hand, his primary opponent’s, Rudy Giuliani and John McCain, perceived strength seem to be their background with the military and war on Terror. I believe, however, that Mitt’s ability to pull smart people together to solve tough social problems and resurrect troubled organizations and governments is unmatchable and absolutely necessary to our national security.

If we continue to spend billions of dollars on the war in Iraq, Afghanistan, on our borders and else where, we need money. To get money we need to reform and reduce government spending. Programs like Social Security and Medicaid need to be overhauled. Moreover, one of the goals of the terrorist is to drain us financially. If they succeed, our economy will tank and our ability to fight the war on Terror will be minimized. Thus, by streamlining government programs and cutting waist, we can keep our economy strong and ensure that we have the resources necessary to fight the war on Terror.

Overall, I believe that reforming failing organizations and our government is essential to preserving a strong economy which will in turn give us the financial ability to fight the war on Terror. Giuliani and McCain simply do not have the skills or experience to reform our failing government. Clearly, Mitt’s the man for that job.